Two can live as cheaply as one? Or 1.7?
Hi, perhaps someone can help me understand this.
When I enter two can live as cheaply as 2.0 vs 1.7, the combined consumption is about $4000 higher (ballpark consumption is about $80k) with the 2.0 than it is with using 1.7; I would have thought our consumption would be higher with numbers less than 2.0 ... what am I missing in my thinking? All other input factors were held constant, including the monte carlo portfolio inputs. Thanks.